









|
| 2000 Closed threads from 2000 (read only) |
23 May 2000, 06:17 PM
|
#1
|
|
Guest
|
Does anyone know if the Sopwith Camel (or any other models) ever used a propeller driven generator? If so, what did it supply with power?
|
|
|
|
23 May 2000, 07:16 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guest
|
Dave:
This may be stretching things, but if the Camel was equiped with a C.C. "syncronizer" (w/o looking I think that would be a LeRhone powered Camel), then the 'pulse generator' would be prop driven. Or rather, driven by a gear mounted to the prop.
Steve
|
|
|
|
23 May 2000, 07:19 PM
|
#3
|
|
Guest
|
Dave:
This may be stretching things, but if the Camel was equiped with a C.C. "syncronizer" (w/o looking I think that would be a LeRhone powered Camel), then the 'pulse generator' would be prop driven. Or rather, driven by a gear mounted to the prop.
Steve
|
|
|
|
24 May 2000, 03:58 AM
|
#4
|
|
Guest
|
If you look at pictures of the day you'll see a small wind-driven pump on the cabane struts or the undercarriage legs. I understand this was used to pressurize the main fuel tank.
As far as an electrical generation goes there was a magneto for ignition.
What else on a Camel needs power?
|
|
|
|
24 May 2000, 08:28 AM
|
#5
|
|
Guest
|
Steve,
Do you mean a gear which just somehow attached to the engine, or a separate small auxilliary propeller? I hate to admit that I don't know what a c.c. synchronizer is.
Gordon,
I'll look through my reference material for a close up of the Sopwith, but in the meantime could you suggest a specific source?
Thanks to both of you. I'm looking at a small prop claimed to be from a Camel to add to my collection of large props, but you can imagine the various claims that are made about these artifacts from the people that are selling them.
Dave
|
|
|
|
24 May 2000, 09:11 AM
|
#6
|
|
Guest
|
Steve,
Do you mean a gear which just somehow attached to the engine, or a separate small auxilliary propeller? I hate to admit that I don't know what a c.c. synchronizer is.
Gordon,
I'll look through my reference material for a close up of the Sopwith, but in the meantime could you suggest a specific source?
Thanks to both of you. I'm looking at a small prop claimed to be from a Camel to add to my collection of large props, but you can imagine the various claims that are made about these artifacts from the people that are selling them.
Dave
|
|
|
|
24 May 2000, 10:13 AM
|
#7
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Stockport UK
|
Gordon is absolutely correct, but just to put a name to it, it's a "Rotherham Pump". You'll see it on other British aircraft of the period. The French used a venturi tube for the same purpose
hth
Peter L
__________________
cheers
Peter L
|
|
|
24 May 2000, 05:08 PM
|
#8
|
|
Guest
|
C.C. Interrupter gear was a machingun fire control mechanism to keep from shooting off your prop. Worked hydraulically and the 'pulse generator' was, on some machines, driven by a toothed gear on the main prop. This is obviously not what you had in mind. The Rotherham was driven by a small prop. Also some aircraft had electrical generators powered by small props. Usually 2 seaters with radios and/or heated flightsuits. The book DE HAVILAND DH-4, FROM FLAMING COFFIN TO LIVING LEGEND has a very good pic of these on pg. 90.
|
|
|
|
31 May 2000, 05:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
Guest
|
Generators, whether driven by small propellors in the slipstream or belts from the engine were usually found on two-seaters to power a radio transmitter when performing artillery spotting.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:24 PM.
|