Quote:
Originally Posted by regular122
An original AD 644 belonging to John Shaw, marked for a 130hp, showed D - 2590 and P - 2650.
Two other examples, pictured below, also have the same data. The AB644 also has the same data.
As to the Lang LP 2850, an article snippet from WWI Aero shows it as D - 2590 and P - 2270. Lang apparently also used an L 3750 with D - 2560 and P - 2400.
I defer to the experts. Hopefully this helps narrow the search. Steve
|
This was just the type of information I was looking for so thanks a lot Steve!
I have been trying to understand the propeller selection for the Camel and in the attached table which is a snippet from British Air Board data from 1917, there are more entries with LP 2850 than AD644 and the former seems to have been more suited to the Clerget since it gave both higher top speed, climb rate and ceiling compared to the AD 644 even at roughly the same T/O weight of around 1480 lb.
Just as one would expect, the lower pitch LP 2850 propeller revs higher but the difference is not as large as I would have expected and it's interesting to note that the LP 2850 beats the AD 644 on both accounts.
Normally, I would have expected the lower pitch propeller to do better in climb and not be as fast and the reverse true for the higher pitch AD 644 but here interestingly the LP 2850 is simply better indicating that the AD 644 is a bit on the coarse side for a 130 hp Clerget.
At least that is my take on this unless someone has any other ideas about why they matched the AD644 with the 130 hp Clerget?
Best regards,
Anders