The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History


The Aerodrome Forum

Iron Doves

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft

Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 March 2014, 06:14 PM   #1
107ch
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milladore, WI
Posts: 67

 
Steel instead of aluminum tube.

Hi, I have a question. I have the full size Graham Lee N17 plans. I am interested in a welded 4130 fuselage instead of the aluminum. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to the relative strength of each material for the purpose of substitution. I assume if I made a fuselage out of steel the same size as the aluminum, I would end up with a tank instead of a plane. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Dennis
107ch is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 31 March 2014, 06:34 PM   #2
derFritz
Observer
 
derFritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3

 
This link should have what you need:
Construction

There are charts that show a direct comparison between 2024 aluminum and 4130 steel tubes. There are lots of resources on that page and I can't remember which book it's in but if you started with the TOC of ANC5 you'd be pretty close.

Fritz
derFritz is offline  
Old 31 March 2014, 06:51 PM   #3
Bookmaker
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Bookmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Marianna, Fl
Posts: 3,050

 
Be careful with the full size Graham Lee plans. They were scaled up from the 7/8 size, but many of the dimensions were not scaled up. I found most correct sizes hand written and incorrect typed. Go through them carefully before you cut anything.

Can't help with the conversion from aluminum to steel.

Dale
__________________
Dale Cavin, Marianna, FL
Bookmaker is offline  
Old 31 March 2014, 07:05 PM   #4
107ch
Observer
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milladore, WI
Posts: 67

 
Thanks Dale, I have gone through those plans several times, I know what you mean.
Hey, could you send me a PM, I would love to give you a call after your busy tax season and pick your brain about your project.
Thanks,
Dennis
107ch is offline  
Old 31 March 2014, 08:10 PM   #5
Bookmaker
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Bookmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Marianna, Fl
Posts: 3,050

 
Sure. Message sent.
__________________
Dale Cavin, Marianna, FL
Bookmaker is offline  
Old 1 April 2014, 03:31 AM   #6
RobW
Forum Ace
 
RobW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Carlisle, PA
Posts: 2,799

 
Aren't the Graham Lee's built from 6061, not 2024?

rob
__________________
Great War Aerodrome

In the air, over there...

RobW is offline  
Old 1 April 2014, 04:13 AM   #7
Brad
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ft. Worth, Texas
Posts: 3,241

 
That is correct Rob.
__________________
Brad

No war for environmentalists! Drill here!

"My point is that KILLING BABIES ON PURPOSE IS NEVER OKAY. " - Craig

"Not even before they are born! " - ME

"Is nailing Jell-O to the wall productive?" - Barker
Brad is offline  
Old 1 April 2014, 05:41 AM   #8
hank jarrett
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Virginia Beach VA
Posts: 661

 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 107ch View Post
Hi, I have a question. I have the full size Graham Lee N17 plans. I am interested in a welded 4130 fuselage instead of the aluminum. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to the relative strength of each material for the purpose of substitution. I assume if I made a fuselage out of steel the same size as the aluminum, I would end up with a tank instead of a plane. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Dennis
You won't get a Tank, but you WILL get a really nice well drill tower!
Hank
hank jarrett is offline  
Old 1 April 2014, 08:49 AM   #9
derFritz
Observer
 
derFritz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3

 
These charts don't cover 6061 tubing (I'm sure others do) but the "difference" would be in your favor. Worst case it might cause you to use a slightly heaver steel tube than you needed.

These charts assume the tubes are straight. I don't know how you would allow for curved tubes like the lower longerons on the Nieuport.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Tube.jpg (334.5 KB, 16 views)
derFritz is offline  
Old 1 April 2014, 01:37 PM   #10
jumpinjan
Forum Ace
 
jumpinjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kettering, Ohio
Posts: 2,127

 
The tubes are only in compression or tension for a box structure.
jumpinjan is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Steel Tube Fuselage scale SE5a Maxim08 Replica Aircraft 9 28 July 2012 05:50 AM
Are there any drawings for a Camel with a steel tube fuselage, out there ??? hector Replica Aircraft 4 4 September 2011 02:47 AM
Full scale SE5A kit w/ steel tube fuselage?? Roland Gilliam Replica Aircraft 15 15 September 2007 05:06 AM
Seamless mild steel tube Maxim08 Replica Aircraft 5 3 January 2007 06:57 AM
SE5A Steel Tube Fuselage 2 place RobW Replica Aircraft 26 2 November 2006 11:32 AM


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.