Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Mark66
Dan-San,
Thanks very much - just the sort of thing I hoped would be out there.
Any Roland aces? Or were Rolands not quite the fighting machine that they look? They do not apperar to have had the altitude performance for long range reconnassance, and perhaps not the ease of control to make them good artillery spotting platforms. Paper (or plywood) tigers perhaps?
Mark66
|
They were quite fast for their time but suffered from several shortcomings. The C.II was apparently rather difficult to fly, partly because of bad downward visibility for the pilot which led to frequent landing accidents. The C.II also had suboptimal maneuverability, reportedly because the fuselage shape
'disrupted' the airflow to the tail surfaces, so they saw little use as fighters. This shortcoming wasn't solved until the last few batches. The Roland C.II was also a favorite obsession of British ace
Albert Ball who claimed to have shot down a disproportionately large number of them in the summer and autumn of 1916 since the Roland never seems to have numbered more than 6% (IIRC) of the German front line inventory. I count 15 Roland C types in his victory tally and another two Roland D type single seat fighters out of 44 claimed victories for Ball.