Well friends, I said it on the other forum, and I'll say it here too. The "shadows" or "cutouts" do NOT match that of the Retired Pilots Badge. Nevermind the fact that the chance of Rumey wearing a RPB was zilch...it just does not add up. A little history read will tell you that he was KIA - no chance to wear one as he never retired from flying...retired from living yes, but not retired from flying.
A brief examination of the photos I posted on GMIC with red filled in areas will show that the angles of the object in the center of the two badges are very very different. I know that there are some who outwardly dismiss cut out pilot badges just because they have not seen or owned one, but are we going to now dismiss period photographs to fit what we think should have been (or not)90 years after the fact??
I could possibly go for the patinated background explanaition as I have seen a very rare Gunner's badge having this effect. I would like to add that the Gunner's badge had a cut out background with a brass plate riveted to the reverse creating a darkening effect to the rear. This could be a possibility here too...but we are still talking cut out. Also, I could (maybe) buy the fact that the background may have been patinated without being cut out. I would like to point out here as I did there that if the "darkened" area on the badge is patinated...why is it not the same depth, shade and consistentcy of the EK I? I find it odd that the "darkened" area on the badge is consistent with the uniform texture and shading surrounding areas of the badge.
But...
Nothing on this earth is going to convince me that Rumey is (1) wearing a badge he was never entitled to, and (2) the angles of the wings on the bird and the plane simply do not match in the photos. Put the photos under an electron microscope if you wish...the angles still won't match. I guess seeing is not believing for some.