The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History


The Aerodrome Forum

WW1 Aero

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft

Aircraft Topics related to WWI aircraft, aircraft engines and armament

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 February 2007, 07:48 PM   #1
Maxim08
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 3,438

 
Fokker #2071

Can anyone tell me anything about the history of 2071?
I came across a reference but couldn't be sure if it came to the US or not.
Thank you,
John
Maxim08 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 28 February 2007, 02:46 PM   #2
Maxim08
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 3,438

 
No responses so far which is a little surprising considering all of the knowledge that is connected to the forum. Let me try a different appraoach. Is there a list available that details all of the D VIIs that came to the US? Were any imported privately or were all of them war prizes?
Regards,
John
Maxim08 is offline  
Old 1 March 2007, 08:56 AM   #3
Cigogne
Forum Ace
 
Cigogne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,638

 
2071... Which type?

You only threw the number 2071 up there. You didn't specify type, or if it had a /15, /16, /17, or /18. Needle in a haystack.

Now that you said D.VII, that gives everyone something to work with. Also, can you specify if it was Fokker, OAW, or Albatros built? Not all Fokker D.VIIs were "Fokker" D.VIIs. Any more clues you can give us?
__________________
Cigogne
Cigogne is offline  
Old 1 March 2007, 02:29 PM   #4
Maxim08
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 3,438

 
Cigogne,
Apologies. I was thinking D VII when I wrote it!
No other information. It was a photo of the ZAK stamp area on an upper wing spar that showed this number as a stamp or stencil, a pencilled date and the burned in ZAK marking.

The date was: 30.9.18

I was hoping that the number alone would provide a clue as to the manufacturer.

I do not have the actual photo so I, regrettably, cannot scan and post for you.

Regards,
John
Maxim08 is offline  
Old 1 March 2007, 04:35 PM   #5
StephenLawson
Shot Down
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,748

 
That might be a werke number. I'll check my lists too.
StephenLawson is offline  
Old 2 March 2007, 07:34 AM   #6
Laserlloyd
Rest in Peace
 
Laserlloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN (USA)
Posts: 2,894

 
I have a work number of 2071 listed for a Fok. Dr.I 446/17.

Lloyd
__________________
http://www.fokkerdr1.com/Buttons_and...010%20Year.jpg
Fokker Dr.I Photo Web Site At FokkerDr1.com Now Join us on Facebook
This site is dedicated to document the pictorial history of all 320 Fokker Dr.I's built during World War I and the fighter pilot Manfred Von Richthofen also known as The "Red Baron"
Laserlloyd is offline  
Old 2 March 2007, 03:31 PM   #7
Maxim08
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 3,438

 
laserlloyd,
Thanks for the info, but it is/was on a D VII wing spar not a Dr1.
BTW, does the xxx/17, xxx/18 indicate the build year, fuselage build date, acceptance date or something else I'm not thinking of? Do they always coincide ie could a pencilled inscription ending in .17 be on a /18 airframe?
Regards,
John
Maxim08 is offline  
Old 2 March 2007, 05:24 PM   #8
Laserlloyd
Rest in Peace
 
Laserlloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Indianapolis, IN (USA)
Posts: 2,894

 
Hi Maxim08:

The /17 and /18 are not for the dates. The /17 is for the Dr.I's and the /18 is for the D VII's.

Lloyd...
__________________
http://www.fokkerdr1.com/Buttons_and...010%20Year.jpg
Fokker Dr.I Photo Web Site At FokkerDr1.com Now Join us on Facebook
This site is dedicated to document the pictorial history of all 320 Fokker Dr.I's built during World War I and the fighter pilot Manfred Von Richthofen also known as The "Red Baron"
Laserlloyd is offline  
Old 3 March 2007, 10:44 PM   #9
Dan_San_Abbott
Rest in Peace
 
Dan_San_Abbott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,118

 

My Gallery
Wing number 2071.

Maxim 08:
Wing number 2071 dated 9/30/18 can not be a Fokker wing. On Fok.D.VII 382/18 the wing number was 2455. Albatros would be in the 5000- 6000 number range.
The number cannot be an OAW serial number, D.VII(OAW)2071/18 would have been built in March or April 1918. It is most likely that it is an OAW built wing from a Fok.D.VII(OAW) 6525/18 to 6624/18 serial number range.
Blue skies,
Dan-San
Dan_San_Abbott is offline  
Old 4 March 2007, 08:26 AM   #10
Maxim08
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cheltenham
Posts: 3,438

 
Dan,
Thank you for the information.
I understand that 43 D VIIs were seized by the British between February 13, 1919 and November 14th, 1919. Of these, 8 came to Canada plus another 7 although I am not clear why some a/c came through the British and some appear to have been directly into Canadian hands. None of the Canadian serials fall into the group you specify although 3 of the British do; 6550, 6556 and 6558.
Is there any way to trace this wing to a specific capture? Are there records that show what serials were brought into the US?
Many thanks for your input.
regards,
John
Maxim08 is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fokker throttle shutt-off/Fokker radiator shutters AchimEngels 2001 17 6 December 2001 12:09 AM
Fokker E. II vs. Fokker E.III Hans 2001 16 26 November 2001 08:54 AM


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.