Quote:
Originally Posted by Polovski
Confusing as hell.
|
Mark, it sounds confusing, but one needs to separate the effect of normal propellor torque from that of gyroscopic precession.
Propellor torque imparts it's effect as a
rolling motion, which causes a tendency for an aircraft to roll in the opposite direction in which the propellor is spinning.
Gyroscopic precession from a spinning rotary (and propellor) imparts its effect when turning left or right as a
pitching force. Additionally, the force of gyroscopic precession is encountered as a result of pitch or yaw input, and until such control movements are applied, gyroscopic precession is largely incidental.
The Sopwith Camel therefore had a tendency to roll leftwards (counterclockwise) due to propellor torque (opposite the airscrew's spinning direction). However, when making military turns, the effect of gyroscopic precession caused the Camel's nose to dive to the right, or climb to the left. The forces of gyroscopic precession had to be compensated for when turning the Camel hard, and therefore pilots learned to apply left rudder to counteract the downward pitch of the nose in right turns,
and to apply left rudder also to keep the nose from rising in hard left turns. Therefore, it can be seen that turning the Camel hard, required pitch corrections to keep the nose of the aircraft from rising in left turns (to prevent stalling), and also left rudder in tight right turns too (to keep the the aircraft from nosing over vertical).
So was the Sopwith Camel faster to the left or right when turning?
Largely depended on how much altitude the pilot could afford to use (or lose) in a dogfight!
One thing though, Camel pilots could never escape the constant effect of gravity.
(you use it, or lose it)