|
It's very simple: the photographed object moved during the film exposition to light. And the end of the propeller moves faster than the part close to axle.
So diring the exposition time end of the propeller was "photographed" in fact in all the locations in which it was diring the exposition, creating continuous picture, wider than the original propeller blade.
With the car it is exactly the opposite. In order to not have the photo moved, photographer was following the car with his camera (panning) as fast as the car was moving. But if he panned the camera little faster (nobody's perfect) than the car was moving, the car came out slanted forward. If he moved the camera too slow, effect would be the opposite.
Cheers!
G.
|