









|
| People Topics related to WWI aviation personnel |
10 June 2007, 03:02 PM
|
#1
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany
Posts: 1,017
|
Balloon Buster vs. Dogfighter
Maybe this is a dumb question. But it came to my attention that some german pilots like Friedrich von Röth mainly killed baloons and earned the blue Max for number of wins. Can we see this as an abuse to win the medal or why did they specialize on them?
regards
K.
__________________
|
|
|
10 June 2007, 03:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 5,749
|
How would it be an abuse of the PlM to go after balloons?
1) Balloon busting was arguably THE most dangerous endeavor in WW I aviation.
2) the reason for the above is that balloons were strategic assets, unlike airplanes, and were defended accordingly. Artillery observation was directly linked to the ground war, and had the potential to kill large numbers of enemy troops and destroy or deter front-line logistics.
The reason that some pilots developed "balloon fever" would make an interesting psychological study, especially since about 30% of the balloon aces were killed, captured, or wounded.
Since one balloon observer and a handful of aircraft observers received the PlM, obviously the high command and the Kaiser approved of their actions.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
|
|
|
10 June 2007, 04:16 PM
|
#3
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany
Posts: 1,017
|
Thanks for your input Barret. I dont know much about Baloons from the books i have read so far.
regards
K.
__________________
|
|
|
10 June 2007, 10:14 PM
|
#4
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Dresden
Posts: 4,595
|
I think Ritter von Tutschek underlined that 6 of his first 13 victories were enemy pilots intending to attack balloons!
|
|
|
10 June 2007, 11:08 PM
|
#5
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2,311
|
Quote:
|
The reason that some pilots developed "balloon fever" would make an interesting psychological study, especially since about 30% of the balloon aces were killed, captured, or wounded.
|
This is very interesting statement and I agree with this. Thank you Barrett
|
|
|
12 June 2007, 03:40 PM
|
#6
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 152
|
To give an idea of the danger involved in attacking balloons, these assets were bracketed by AA and machine guns. Unlike normal AA fire directed at a passing plane that had to estimate altitude, AA fire protecting a balloon knew your altitude (same as the balloon plus a bit more) and could put up a lethal curtain of fire that you had to fly through.
If you got through the high explosive AA then you were probably low enough to attract ground fire from machine guns and rifles. Very dangerous, probably more so than the HE.
Finally there was the fighter cover. If you attacked the balloon you exposed you rear end to enemy fighters and effectively handed them an altitude advantage to go along with it. Also very dangerous.
This is why IMHO the SPAD was the premier balloon buster. Tough enough to take abuse on the attack it was also fast enough to escape when the attack was completed.
|
|
|
13 June 2007, 03:41 AM
|
#7
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 134
|
Terrible shot ???
I don't have sources in front of me to cite but I believe that I've read on more than one occasion that Roth was a terrible marksman
|
|
|
13 June 2007, 04:02 AM
|
#8
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Leverkusen-Opladen, Germany
Posts: 1,017
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bettors Pub
I don't have sources in front of me to cite but I believe that I've read on more than one occasion that Roth was a terrible marksman
|
Your are right. It is mentioned in Osprey Aircraft of the Aces #63 on page 10 in the paragraph about Jasta 16b.
[...] Röth was not considered a good marksman, and this apparently led him to specialize in balloons because they were larger targets. However, he still managed to shoot down eight aircraft. [...] (Van Wyngarden, Franks 2004)
__________________
|
|
|
13 June 2007, 05:45 AM
|
#9
|
|
Forum Ace of Aces
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: St. Charles, Iowa
Posts: 6,724
|
Hi,
You will read in some secondary sources that Fritz Röth was a terrible marksman because he had very poor eyesight, but I've never seen an original, primary source to confirm that he had vision problems. However, his close friend Max Gossner did imply that he wasn't the best marksman. He wrote that when they both served as novice fighter pilots in Jasta 23b in November 1917, they both had poor results when shooting at a stationary ground target from their airborne Albatrosse. Then, one day, Röth said thoughtfully, "You know, these "sausages", actually, you just have to hit one of them."
Later on, Gossner says, "If he had been as good a shot as he was a daring fighter pilot then he would have obtained even more successes."
(Wenn er ein ebenso guter Schütze wie schneidiger Jagdflieger gewesen wäre, dann hätte er noch weit mehr Erfolge errungen.)
Greg
__________________
Greg VanWyngarden
An expert is a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field.
Niels Bohr
|
|
|
21 June 2007, 05:31 PM
|
#10
|
|
Rest in Peace
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ceres, California
Posts: 9,118
|
They are big and easier to hit!
Gentlemen:
In a visit to Willy Coppens in 1972, I asked Willy,"Why did you go after balloons?" He answer was, "As hard as I tried, I had been unsuccessful in shooting down German aircraft. I saw how big the German observation balloons were, and I thought, I could not miss a target that big. So I attacked a German balloon and shot it down. That Is why I shot down balloons."
Blue skies,
Dan-San
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM.
|